PHMSA
has posted Frequently Asked Questions for the recently finalized Distribution
Integrity Management Program regulation. We have inserted a few noteworthy
FAQ’s below. To view the entire list of FAQ’s, click here.
A.8 The regulation exempts the installation of EFVs on services which do not
operate at a pressure of 10 psig or greater throughout the year. Can you give
examples of types of documentation that would be acceptable in demonstrating
this issue?
Two possible methods to demonstrate that services operate at a pressure less
than 10 PSIG include; (1) distribution system design documents, validated with
actual pressure readings, which show that the main and therefore the associated
services are designed to operate below 10 PSIG, or (2) actual pressure
recordings or readings on all feeds which are upstream of the service(s) which
are less than 10 psig.
B.2.2 Will operators be compared against other operators or national leak or
safety data?
PHMSA recognizes that operators need to develop a DIMP plan appropriate for the
applicable threats, the operating characteristics of their specific
distribution delivery system, and the customers that they serve. PHMSA and
State partners intend to focus on each individual operator’s performance
trends.
C.3.7 Are operators required to include “farm taps” in their
distribution integrity management plan?
In the past, distribution, gathering, and transmission operators connected
landowners directly to transmission and gathering pipelines often in exchange
for the right to install the pipeline across a landowner’s property. This
connection to the gas pipeline is commonly referred to as a “farm tap”.
Although new farm taps are not installed nearly as frequently as they were in
the past, “farm taps” are very common. The vast majority of “farm taps” meet
the definition of a distribution line given that they do not meet the criteria
to be classified as a gathering line or a transmission line.
The “farm tap” is pipeline upstream of the outlet of the customer meter or
connection to the customer meter, whichever is further downstream, and is
responsibility of the operator. The pipeline downstream of this point is the
responsibility of the customer. Some States require the operator to maintain
certain portions of customer owned pipeline. The pipeline maintained by the
operator must be in compliance with 49 Part 192.
Operators of distribution, gathering, and transmission lines with “farm taps”
must have a distribution integrity management program meeting the requirements
of Subpart P for this distribution pipeline. The DIMP plan is not required to
include the customer-owned pipeline (unless required otherwise by State law).
The operator having responsibility for operations and maintenance activities
for the facility is responsible for developing and implementing the DIMP plan.
C.4.c.2 From which date are operators required to collect data for their
Plan?
Operators should use the information they already have and start keeping
additional data to develop their plan (e.g., assess the threats) as soon as
possible. They need to assemble and evaluate enough data to be able to evaluate
the risk. Useful and usable historical data is needed to identify threats and
trends.
C.4.g.5 Are multiple tickets for a single job counted as single excavation
ticket?
Some state laws require excavators to call in additional requests for on-going
jobs prior to the life of the first excavation request expiring. In reporting
data these additional requests for excavation projects of extended duration may
be counted since there is excavation work associated with those requests.
However, operators do not need to change the criteria for counting excavation
tickets for the purpose of reporting performance measures. If they currently
count multiple tickets for a single job, they may continue that practice. The
definition of “ticket” should remain consistent with State law and one-call
center definition.
C.5.5 Must operators report to PHMSA mechanical fitting failures that
occurred historically (i.e., before a final DIMP rule became effective)?
Currently the DIMP rule states that operators need to collect data about
mechanical fitting failures that result in hazardous leaks starting January 1,
2010 but PHMSA published a Federal Register notice on June 28, 2010 to inform
operators that the portion of the Annual Report relative to mechanical fitting
failures will be delayed by one year and will take effect starting with the
2011 calendar year. PHMSA is developing a final rule to revise the dates in the
regulation.
C.7.2 What will PHMSA (or States) require for proposals for alternate
inspection intervals?
Proposals must be submitted to each applicable oversight agency (usually the
State). Each State will implement this provision under the State’s procedures.
State authorities and regulatory structures differ. Requirements for
consideration of an alternative interval may differ among State regulatory
authorities. The regulatory authority will be responsible for reviewing each
proposal, determining safe intervals based on the information in the operator’s
proposal, and approving or rejecting the proposal.
Proposed alternative inspection intervals must demonstrate an equal or improved
overall level of safety including the effect of the reduced frequency of
periodic inspections. A quantitative estimate of risk is not required. PHMSA is
developing criteria for evaluating an operator’s alternative interval proposal
in the states where PHMSA exercises enforcement authority over distribution pipelines.
In This Issue
- Technical Pipeline Safety Advisory Committee Teleconference Meetings
- PHMSA Advisory Bulletin ADB–10–06 Personal Electronic Device (PED) Related Distractions
- Standard Operating Procedure Updates
- PHMSA Updates DIMP FAQ’s August 2, 2010
- RCP’s Web-Based Compliance Management Systems
- DIMP Integration
- Key Features
- SPCC Extension Proposed for some Facilities
- Maine Safety & Operation Standards for LPG Distribution Systems
- Misc. Ohio Pipeline Safety Regulation Changes
- Pending Audits?
- Underground Pipeline Damage Prevention Workshop August 18, 2010 – Austin, Texas
- DOT Pipeline Compliance Workshop – October 19 – 21, 2010
- WRGC Regional Gas Conference August 24 & 25, 2010 Tempe, AZ