PHMSA
has revised or added several control room management frequently asked questions
related to shift schedules and testing of backup manual operations plans.
C.14 With respect to testing and verification of backup manual operations,
is the intent to test every manual operation or to test the capability to
execute the backup plans, procedures, and processes?
Operators must test and verify that its internal communications plan can
effectually implement backup manual operations in the event of a SCADA system
failure. The test and verification process must be designed to confirm that the
operator has adequate personnel, procedures, processes, communications
infrastructure, and manual command-and-control capabilities to assure safe,
reliable operations and pipeline integrity when operating manually. Such
testing should (i) verify the sufficient and timely deployment of qualified
personnel to field locations necessary to adequately operate equipment and
monitor pipeline integrity, (ii) establish, supplement, and/or verify
performance of its communications or command center, and (iii) exercise
critical decision-making processes. Testing and verification should address all
types of actions necessary to mobilize manual operations. Testing and
verification should be performed on at least a representative sampling of the
processes and equipment intended to be used during backup operations.
[§§ 192.631(c)(4) and 195.446(c)(4)]
D.14 If an operator doesn’t have shift lengths, schedule rotations, and
maximum limit on hours of service explicitly noted in their fatigue mitigation
related procedures, is an operator’s actual shift schedule and related records
adequate to demonstrate compliance with (d)(1) and (d)(4)?
No. The rule requires operators to have written procedures that implement the
fatigue mitigation requirements. PHMSA would expect an operator’s fatigue
mitigation related procedures to describe the bounding parameters in shift
lengths and schedule rotations, and maximum hours of service limits they have
established as the general framework for their program. PHMSA would then expect
to see examples of actual schedules, timesheets and other records to show how
those procedures are implemented, including if/how any changes to those
schedules are managed in the context of the procedures. Schedules and
timesheets alone are likely not adequate, as they are subject to change in the
case of call-outs, vacation, etc. and would only give a certain snapshot in
time. Written procedures would provide the framework in which those schedules
can be changed and managed to reduce the risks associated with fatigue.
[§§ 192.631(d)(1) and (d)(4) and 195.446(d)(1) and (4)]
D.15 Does the information presented in the other CRM FAQs and inspection
criteria account for schedules of 7 consecutive day or night shifts followed by
7 consecutive days off, generally referred to as 7 on/7 off type shift
schedules?
Control Room Management regulations do not exclude the use of 7 on/7 off type
schedules. The regulations do, however, require the implementation of methods,
including establishing shift lengths and schedule rotations, to reduce the risk
associated with controller fatigue for any and all schedules. As part of
fatigue mitigation strategies, PHMSA expects operators to have a scientific
basis for the schedules and limits they select, and consider circadian effects,
different types of shifts, the need for rest, and other factors highlighted by
relevant research. As part of an overall fatigue mitigation program, operators
need to take into account the relative fatigue risks of whatever schedule and
limits they select, and ultimately be able to demonstrate how either the limits
they select reduce the risk of fatigue, or how fatigue mitigation tactics
(countermeasures) and other aspects of their overall program are sufficient to
reduce the risk for fatigue.
There is an increased risk for fatigue as the number of successive shifts
increase, particularly successive shifts involving night work. PHMSA’s CRM
website is a resource for information about fatigue management and related
mitigation strategies. FAQs provide some reasonable limits to consider, along
with shifts/times where fatigue risks are elevated and where fatigue mitigation
tactics should be implemented. Still other FAQs provide some examples of
fatigue mitigation tactics (countermeasures.) The level of risk appears to
increase in shift plans with periods that approach 7 successive shifts in a
row, particularly if the 7 successive shifts all involve night work.
If an operator chooses to use limits past those recommended in FAQs and
Inspection Guidance material, including 7-on/7-off schedules, an operator would
need to provide sufficient justification on how their overall program reduces
the risk for fatigue. Such justification may require different or additional
countermeasures or a more comprehensive fatigue risk management approach.
There are a number of trade-offs in considering any schedule rotation,
including 7-on/7-off type schedules. In addition to other guidance already
provided, a white paper entitled “Shift Plans with Seven Consecutive
Shifts (Miller, April 2012)” discusses the pros and cons behind such
schedules, including some countermeasures that should be considered above and
beyond those already included in other FAQs.
Operators should expect that inspectors would be more inquisitive about how they
protect against fatigue risks on the 6th and 7th successive days of work (if
day only), and on the 4th through 7th successive nights of work.
[§§ 192.631(d) and 195.446(d)]
In This Issue
- PHMSA ADB-2012-08 Pipeline Safety: Inspection & Protection of Pipeline Facilities after Railway Accidents
- PHMSA Request for Comments on IMP Requirements & Response Plans
- Introducing MaxOp*
- MAOP Validation Services
- Retirement of ODES 1 – pre-2010 submittal of Annual, Accident, and Incident Reports
- PHMSA updates Control Room Management FAQ’s
- Control Room Management Services
- 8-11: A Day for Damage Prevention
- TRRC Amendment to 16 TAC Chapter 8 – Pipeline Safety Regulations
- API Damage Prevention Workshop September 12 -13, Houston, TX
- Damage Prevention Plans
- Meet me at the Conference